Bitcoin (BTC) recently crossed the $107,000 mark amid growing concerns over weakening demand, as key on-chain metrics signal a shift in market dynamics. Despite robust institutional interest—highlighted by MicroStrategy’s latest $531.9 million acquisition—and a surge in ETF inflows, on-chain data reveals that buyer momentum is faltering relative to increasing supply from miners and long-term holders.
This article explores the nuanced landscape of current Bitcoin demand, the role of corporate treasuries, and how institutional inflows are shaping market resilience—even as short-term pressure mounts.
Bitcoin’s Apparent Demand Turns Negative
According to recent data from CryptoQuant, Bitcoin’s Apparent Demand indicator turned negative, signaling that incoming supply from miners and profit-taking long-term holders (LTHs) now exceeds new buying activity.
👉 Discover how smart money is positioning itself ahead of the next market shift.
The Apparent Demand metric calculates the difference between newly mined BTC and changes in dormant supply. A negative reading suggests that fresh demand isn’t strong enough to absorb the influx of coins hitting the market, often a precursor to increased volatility or price corrections.
As analyst Crazyblockk noted, “The volume of Bitcoin entering the market from miners and profit-taking LTHs now surpasses what new buyers are absorbing.” This imbalance can create selling pressure, especially if large holders continue to cash out near all-time highs.
Moreover, rising LTH sell-offs suggest that some investors view current price levels—hovering around $107,500—as a favorable exit point. While not inherently bearish, such behavior reflects market maturity and a shift from speculative accumulation to strategic profit realization.
Corporate Bitcoin Buying Continues Unabated
Amid cooling retail and on-chain demand, corporate treasury strategies are emerging as a critical support pillar for Bitcoin’s price floor.
MicroStrategy (MSTR) remains the most aggressive player, announcing its eleventh consecutive week of Bitcoin purchases. In the week ending June 29, the company acquired 4,980 BTC at an average price of $106,801 per coin**, spending a total of **$531.9 million. This brings its total holdings to 597,325 BTC, just 2,675 coins short of the symbolic 600,000 milestone.
Michael Saylor’s firm has become synonymous with corporate Bitcoin adoption, using debt and equity financing to accumulate BTC as a long-term treasury reserve asset. Its strategy has inspired over 130 public companies worldwide to follow suit, including Metaplanet, GameStop, Semler Scientific, ProCap BTC, and Galaxy Digital.
However, while these purchases capture headlines, their actual market impact is more nuanced. Most acquisitions are funded through stock offerings or balance sheet reallocations rather than direct cash purchases—meaning they don’t always inject new buying pressure into spot markets.
Still, the psychological effect is significant. These moves reinforce Bitcoin’s narrative as a macro hedge against inflation and currency devaluation, attracting further institutional attention.
ETF Inflows Counterbalance Selling Pressure
While on-chain demand weakens, Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are absorbing substantial selling pressure. In the past week alone, U.S.-based Bitcoin ETFs recorded $2.2 billion in net inflows**, bringing year-to-date inflows to **$14.9 billion by mid-2025.
According to CoinShares, this represents 83% of total crypto product inflows ($17.8 billion) so far this year—underscoring investor preference for regulated, accessible exposure to Bitcoin.
These inflows are crucial because they act as a buffer against profit-taking by long-term holders and miners needing to cover operational costs. ETFs, backed by major financial institutions like BlackRock and Fidelity, provide deep liquidity and attract capital from traditional finance (TradFi) investors who might otherwise avoid direct crypto ownership.
👉 See how institutional capital is reshaping the future of digital assets.
Nonetheless, options markets reflect caution. Data from Derive shows that around 20% of open interest is concentrated in put options at strike prices of $85,000**, **$100,000, and $106,000—suggesting traders are hedging against downside risk amid macro uncertainty and recent price strength.
Nick Forster, founder of Derive, explained: “This indicates positioning for potential pullbacks, possibly in anticipation of broader economic shifts or profit-taking after a strong rally.”
Market Outlook: A Tale of Two Forces
The current Bitcoin market reflects a tug-of-war between two powerful forces:
- Bullish drivers: Corporate treasuries accumulating BTC, strong ETF inflows, and growing regulatory clarity.
- Bearish pressures: Weakening apparent demand, rising miner output, and profit-taking by early adopters.
While price remains elevated near $107,500, the underlying structure suggests consolidation may be ahead. Historically, such phases precede either breakout rallies or deeper corrections—depending on whether new demand emerges to absorb supply.
Importantly, the diversification of buyer profiles—from retail speculators to corporations and institutional funds—adds resilience. Even if retail momentum slows, structural demand from ETFs and corporate balance sheets provides a floor.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Why is Bitcoin demand considered weak if prices are near all-time highs?
A: Price doesn't always reflect immediate demand. On-chain metrics like Apparent Demand show that supply from miners and long-term sellers currently exceeds new buying activity—even as ETFs and institutions absorb much of that supply.
Q: Does MicroStrategy’s continued buying influence Bitcoin’s price directly?
A: Not immediately. Most of MicroStrategy’s purchases are funded through stock sales, which don’t involve direct spot market buys. However, their actions boost market sentiment and validate Bitcoin as a treasury asset.
Q: Are Bitcoin ETFs enough to sustain upward price momentum?
A: ETFs provide strong structural support by channeling institutional capital into Bitcoin. However, sustained price growth requires broader adoption and new demand beyond passive funds.
Q: What does negative Apparent Demand mean for investors?
A: It signals increased risk of short-term volatility or pullbacks. It doesn’t mean a bear market is coming—but it suggests caution until fresh buying pressure re-emerges.
Q: How do long-term holders impact the market when they sell?
A: LTHs often sell after significant price rallies. Their profit-taking can increase circulating supply, but it also indicates confidence in having achieved meaningful returns.
Q: Is now a good time to invest in Bitcoin?
A: That depends on your risk tolerance and investment horizon. With ETFs providing regulated access and corporate adoption growing, fundamentals remain strong—but timing entries during consolidation phases may offer better value.
👉 Learn how to navigate volatile markets with strategic entry points.
Conclusion
Bitcoin’s journey in 2025 reflects increasing maturity. While short-term demand indicators may flicker, structural adoption—driven by ETFs, corporate treasuries, and regulated financial products—is deepening.
The dip in apparent demand serves as a reminder that price appreciation requires continuous inflow of new capital. Yet, with over $14.9 billion poured into Bitcoin products this year alone and companies like MicroStrategy nearing 600,000 BTC holdings, the long-term trajectory remains compelling.
Investors should watch both on-chain flows and institutional activity to gauge the next phase of Bitcoin’s evolution—not just price alone.
Core Keywords: Bitcoin demand, MicroStrategy Bitcoin purchase, Bitcoin ETF inflows, corporate Bitcoin adoption, Apparent Demand indicator, institutional crypto investment, Bitcoin market analysis