Bitcoin has been a polarizing force in the financial world since its inception. While some view it as the future of money—a digital gold or a revolutionary peer-to-peer payment system—others remain skeptical about its intrinsic value. As prices fluctuate and market sentiment shifts, one fundamental question persists: What is the value foundation of Bitcoin?
To unpack this, we turn to former Google engineer Shiv Sakhuja, who explored the various narratives shaping Bitcoin’s perceived worth. Despite being a recurring topic in crypto circles, there’s still no consensus. This article examines the core value propositions of Bitcoin, analyzing both supporting and opposing arguments across multiple dimensions.
👉 Discover why so many investors are watching Bitcoin's long-term potential
The Many Faces of Bitcoin
Sakhuja highlights that most people in the crypto space believe Bitcoin is “up only” over the long term, with widespread expectations that it will surpass $100,000 within five years. Yet, he urges critical thinking: What assumptions are we taking for granted? Below are the primary value narratives attributed to Bitcoin today.
- Store of value
- Inflation hedge
- Peer-to-peer (P2P) payment network
- National reserve currency
- Native internet currency
- Personal wealth sanctuary
- Foundational blockchain infrastructure
- Asymmetric investment opportunity
Each of these perspectives offers a different lens through which to assess Bitcoin’s potential. Let’s explore them in detail.
Bitcoin as a Store of Value
One of the most dominant narratives is that Bitcoin is digital gold—a scarce, durable, portable, and divisible asset designed to preserve wealth over time.
Supporters argue that Bitcoin outperforms traditional stores of value like gold and fiat currencies because:
- It has a fixed supply cap of 21 million coins.
- It’s easily transferable across borders.
- It resists censorship and confiscation.
- It’s more divisible (down to satoshis).
These properties align with those of sound money, making Bitcoin an ideal candidate for long-term value storage.
Opposing View: Critics point out that scarcity alone doesn’t guarantee value. Other cryptocurrencies like Litecoin or Dogecoin also exhibit scarcity but lack comparable market confidence. Moreover, Bitcoin’s high volatility undermines its utility as a stable store of value—especially when real-world transactions are priced in stable fiat currencies like USD or EUR.
Rebuttal: Proponents counter that volatility decreases over time as markets mature. Historical data shows Bitcoin’s price swings have gradually lessened with each cycle, suggesting it may eventually stabilize enough to function reliably as a store of value.
Bitcoin as an Inflation Hedge
With central banks printing money at unprecedented rates, many investors see Bitcoin as a hedge against inflation.
The argument hinges on supply mechanics: unlike fiat currencies, which can be inflated indefinitely, Bitcoin’s issuance is algorithmically capped. This makes it immune to monetary debasement.
Supporters draw parallels with gold—a historically trusted inflation-resistant asset—and suggest Bitcoin could fulfill a similar role in the digital age. They emphasize long-term validation over short-term price correlations.
Opponents, including prominent thinker Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb), challenge this view. He argues that scarcity does not equal inflation resistance, noting that many rare items hold little economic value. Without proven macroeconomic resilience during hyperinflation events, Bitcoin’s status as a hedge remains unverified.
👉 See how global economic trends are influencing crypto adoption
Bitcoin as a P2P Payment Network
Bitcoin was originally designed as a decentralized payment system—enabling fast, secure, low-cost transfers without intermediaries.
Advantages cited by supporters:
- Cross-border transactions settle in minutes, not days.
- No banking hours or holidays delay transfers.
- Censorship-resistant: governments cannot block payments.
- Capable of moving billions at minimal cost.
This makes Bitcoin particularly valuable in regions with underdeveloped financial infrastructure.
However, practical limitations exist:
- Volatility creates uncertainty in transaction value.
- High fees during network congestion reduce efficiency.
- Regulatory hurdles and tax implications complicate usage.
- Faster alternatives (e.g., stablecoins on Layer 2s) often serve better for daily payments.
While the vision is compelling, real-world adoption for everyday payments remains limited.
Could Bitcoin Become a National Reserve Currency?
Some believe Bitcoin could replace the U.S. dollar as the world’s primary reserve currency—especially if confidence in fiat systems erodes.
Countries like El Salvador and the Central African Republic have already adopted Bitcoin as legal tender, signaling early institutional interest. For nations suffering from weak local currencies, Bitcoin offers a sovereign-free alternative.
Proponents argue that game theory will drive broader adoption: even skeptical nations may accumulate Bitcoin as a strategic hedge to avoid falling behind.
Critics remain unconvinced, pointing out:
- Without price stability, it cannot function as reliable money.
- Superpowers like the U.S. have strong incentives to suppress any threat to dollar dominance.
- Widespread national adoption requires infrastructure and regulatory alignment still far from reality.
Thus, while symbolic moves matter, systemic shift seems distant.
Is Bitcoin the Native Currency of the Internet?
As digital economies grow, so does the need for native digital money. Advocates believe Bitcoin is best positioned due to its unmatched security and decentralization.
Jack Dorsey, former Twitter CEO, has championed this idea, arguing that value transmission should be as seamless as information sharing online.
Yet challenges remain:
- High fees and slow confirmations hinder microtransactions.
- Most web3 applications are built on Ethereum or EVM-compatible chains.
- Users prioritize convenience over decentralization.
For Bitcoin to become the internet’s default payment layer, significant scalability improvements are needed—possibly through Layer 2 solutions like the Lightning Network.
A Safe Haven for Personal Wealth
In countries plagued by hyperinflation—such as Venezuela, Argentina, and Turkey—Bitcoin serves as a lifeline for citizens seeking to protect their savings.
This narrative centers on financial sovereignty: individuals should control their wealth without reliance on failing institutions.
But again, success depends on Bitcoin first proving itself as a stable store of value. And if it poses a threat to state control, governments may respond with bans or restrictions.
Bitcoin as Foundational Blockchain Infrastructure
Some developers envision all future blockchain innovation being built directly on Bitcoin’s protocol—the most decentralized and secure layer available.
Currently, however, most dApps and smart contracts run on platforms like Ethereum. For Bitcoin to compete, it needs enhanced programmability without compromising security—a challenge actively explored via protocols like Ordinals and Stacks.
The Asymmetric Investment Thesis
Perhaps the most compelling reason to hold Bitcoin isn’t any single use case—but the asymmetric risk-reward profile.
Here’s the logic:
- Upside: If any of the above narratives succeed (e.g., digital gold, global reserve), returns could exceed +500%.
- Downside: Maximum loss is -100% (total collapse).
Mathematically, if there’s more than a 20% chance of massive upside, the expected value of holding Bitcoin remains positive—even if failure is likely.
This probabilistic mindset drives many long-term holders (“HODLers”) who accept short-term volatility for potential long-term gains.
👉 Learn how strategic investors approach asymmetric opportunities in crypto
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Does Bitcoin have intrinsic value like gold or real estate?
A: Unlike physical assets, Bitcoin’s value isn’t derived from utility or production costs alone—it stems from network trust, scarcity, and adoption potential. Its "intrinsic value" is debated but increasingly tied to its role as decentralized digital money.
Q: Can Bitcoin replace the U.S. dollar?
A: While theoretically possible, replacing the dollar would require unprecedented global coordination, regulatory acceptance, and price stability—none of which are imminent. However, Bitcoin could coexist as an alternative reserve asset.
Q: Why do people call Bitcoin “digital gold”?
A: Because both are scarce, durable, and resistant to debasement. Like gold, Bitcoin is seen as a long-term store of value—though it's more portable and easier to verify.
Q: Isn’t Bitcoin too volatile to be useful?
A: Yes, currently. But volatility tends to decline as markets mature. Early-stage price swings don’t necessarily invalidate long-term utility.
Q: What happens if governments ban Bitcoin?
A: Bans may slow adoption in certain regions but won’t eliminate demand globally. Decentralized networks are resilient to localized suppression—though access may shift underground or via circumvention tools.
Q: How do I start investing in Bitcoin safely?
A: Begin with reputable exchanges, use hardware wallets for storage, diversify investments, and never invest more than you can afford to lose.
Final Thoughts
Bitcoin’s value proposition rests on multiple evolving narratives—from inflation protection to financial sovereignty and asymmetric investing. While none are guaranteed, the convergence of technological innovation, macroeconomic uncertainty, and growing institutional interest suggests its relevance is far from fading.
Whether it becomes digital gold, internet money, or simply a high-risk/high-reward asset class, understanding its foundational arguments helps investors make informed decisions in an unpredictable landscape.
"It doesn’t matter which narrative turns out to be true—as long as one does."