In a significant move for transparency and investor insight, Weiss Ratings has unveiled a detailed evaluation of 93 major cryptocurrencies. As one of the longest-standing independent financial research firms in the U.S., founded in 1971, Weiss Ratings brings decades of institutional credibility to the volatile world of digital assets. This latest report offers a data-driven snapshot of the current crypto landscape, assessing each asset based on technology, adoption, and market performance.
The ratings provide a clear framework for understanding digital asset quality—offering investors a structured way to evaluate risk and potential. Notably, Bitcoin (BTC) received a B-, while Ethereum (ETH), IOTA, NEO, XRP, STEEM, TRX, and XLM also landed in the B category. A total of 14 cryptocurrencies were rated B or B-, with no asset achieving an A or B+ grade.
👉 Discover how top-rated cryptos are shaping the future of finance
Understanding the Weiss Crypto Rating System
Weiss Ratings employs a proprietary model that analyzes thousands of data points across three core dimensions:
- Technology: Evaluates network security, scalability, decentralization, code quality, and innovation.
- Adoption: Measures real-world usage, developer activity, exchange listings, and community growth.
- Market Performance: Assesses liquidity, volatility, trading volume, and investor sentiment.
Each cryptocurrency is scored independently across these categories before being assigned a composite letter grade. According to Weiss:
- A = Excellent
- B = Good
- C = Fair
- D = Poor
- E = Very Poor
Grades modified with "+" or "–" indicate performance one-third above or below the base tier. Cryptocurrencies deemed non-functional or involved in fraud receive an F, though none of the 93 assets reviewed earned this failing mark.
Importantly, Weiss emphasizes that a B or B- rating signals a “buy” signal from an investment standpoint. Even C-rated assets are considered “hold” candidates, reflecting acceptable fundamentals despite limitations.
This nuanced approach helps investors avoid binary thinking—just because a coin isn’t “perfect” doesn’t mean it lacks value. Conversely, high visibility doesn’t guarantee high quality.
Breakdown of Top-Tier Cryptocurrencies (B and B-)
Among the highest-rated digital assets:
- ADA (Cardano), DCR (Decred), and EOS received a B, reflecting strong technical foundations and active development ecosystems.
- BTC, ETH, BTS (BitShares), IOTA, ONT (Ontology), NEO, XRP, STEEM, TRX (Tron), XLM (Stellar), and ZIL (Zilliqa) were all rated B-.
Bitcoin’s B- reflects its dominance in security and adoption but is weighed down by persistent issues like network congestion and high transaction fees. Despite ongoing upgrades like SegWit and the Lightning Network, Weiss notes that Bitcoin still struggles with direct software scalability improvements.
Ethereum maintains a solid position due to its robust smart contract platform and widespread developer support, though it faces challenges related to gas fees and transition timelines to Proof-of-Stake.
Mid-Tier Performers: The C-Rated Majority
Fifty-four cryptocurrencies earned a C, C+, or C- rating, forming the largest cohort in the review. These include well-known names such as:
- BCH (Bitcoin Cash) – C-
- DASH
- DOGE (Dogecoin)
- ETC (Ethereum Classic)
- LSK (Lisk)
- LTC (Litecoin)
- XMR (Monero)
- XEM (NEM)
- QTUM
- SC (Siacoin)
- STRAT (Stratis)
- UBQ (Ubiq)
- VEN (VeChain)
- WAVES
- ZEC (Zcash)
While these assets show varying degrees of utility and community engagement, they generally lag in scalability, decentralization, or real-world integration. For example, Litecoin scores points for reliability but lacks innovation beyond being a "silver to Bitcoin’s gold." Similarly, privacy coins like Monero and Zcash face regulatory scrutiny that impacts adoption potential.
👉 See which mid-tier cryptos are quietly building long-term value
Key Takeaways for Investors
Weiss Ratings does not treat letter grades as absolute buy/sell signals. Instead, they encourage investors to use the ratings as part of a broader due diligence process.
A few critical insights:
- No Perfect Crypto Exists Yet
Even Bitcoin and Ethereum—market leaders—fall short of an “A” rating. This underscores the immature state of the entire industry. - Grades Reflect Trade-offs
High decentralization often comes at the cost of speed; fast networks may sacrifice security. Understanding these balances is essential. - C-Rated Coins Aren’t Automatically Bad
Many serve niche functions or are early-stage projects. With proper research, some could outperform higher-rated peers over time. - Avoid FOMO Based on Hype Alone
Popularity on social media or price surges don’t correlate with fundamental strength. Use ratings to filter noise.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Why didn’t any cryptocurrency receive an A rating?
A: According to Weiss Ratings, no current blockchain perfectly balances technological advancement, user adoption, and sustainable economics. The ecosystem is still evolving, and even top projects have notable weaknesses.
Q: What does a C rating mean for an investor?
A: A C grade indicates fair performance—neither strong nor failing. It typically translates to a “hold” recommendation, suggesting cautious monitoring rather than active buying or selling.
Q: How often are these ratings updated?
A: Weiss updates its crypto ratings regularly, though major revisions are published periodically. Subscribers can access updated reports through their official site.
Q: Are privacy coins like Monero undervalued by traditional rating systems?
A: Possibly. While Monero excels in anonymity and security, regulatory risks and limited merchant adoption affect its overall score. Rating agencies must weigh innovation against compliance realities.
Q: Can I trust Weiss Ratings over other analysts?
A: Weiss has a long history in financial research and uses transparent methodology. However, all ratings should be cross-referenced with on-chain data, team credibility, and market trends.
Final Thoughts: Using Ratings Wisely
At the time of publication, Bitcoin was trading around $7,458—a reminder that price alone doesn’t reflect intrinsic value. The Weiss scorecard offers a much-needed anchor in an environment flooded with speculation.
Whether you're evaluating BTC’s scalability limits or assessing whether EOS’s governance model holds long-term promise, tools like this bring clarity.
👉 Compare real-time crypto ratings and make smarter investment decisions
As the digital asset space matures, comprehensive analysis will become increasingly vital. While no single rating tells the whole story, combining objective metrics with informed judgment empowers investors to navigate risk—and opportunity—with confidence.
Core Keywords: crypto ratings, Weiss Ratings, Bitcoin rating, Ethereum rating, cryptocurrency analysis, digital asset evaluation, crypto investment guide, blockchain scoring