The rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market has intensified the need for clear regulatory frameworks in the United States. Two primary federal agencies—the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)—play pivotal roles in shaping how digital assets are governed. While each has a distinct mandate, their jurisdictions frequently intersect, leading to ambiguity for crypto businesses and investors alike.
Understanding the regulatory landscape requires clarity on how these agencies define and enforce rules around digital assets. This article breaks down the roles of the CFTC and SEC, explores their overlapping authorities, examines key developments from 2023 to 2024, and offers insight into what lies ahead for the crypto industry.
The CFTC's Role: Crypto as a Commodity
The CFTC is primarily responsible for regulating commodities and their derivatives, including futures, options, and swaps. In the context of cryptocurrency, it treats Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) as commodities under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA). This classification grants the CFTC authority over crypto derivatives markets, where futures contracts and other financial instruments tied to digital assets are traded.
One of the agency’s core responsibilities is preventing market manipulation, fraud, and abusive trading practices. This extends beyond derivatives to include spot markets when price distortions could impact futures pricing. For instance, activities like wash trading or pump-and-dump schemes on unregulated exchanges may fall under CFTC scrutiny if they influence broader market integrity.
A landmark enforcement action occurred in 2020 when the CFTC charged BitMEX with operating an unregistered trading platform and failing to implement proper Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) procedures. The resulting $100 million settlement underscored the CFTC’s willingness to hold platforms accountable—even those based offshore—if they serve U.S. customers.
👉 Discover how regulatory clarity can shape your crypto strategy.
More recently, the CFTC has turned its attention to decentralized finance (DeFi). In 2024, it reached a settlement with Uniswap Labs, highlighting concerns over unregulated derivatives trading and potential market manipulation on decentralized platforms. This case illustrates the evolving challenge of applying traditional regulatory models to decentralized ecosystems.
The SEC's Role: Crypto as a Security
In contrast, the SEC focuses on protecting investors by regulating securities—financial instruments that represent investment contracts, equity, or debt. Its involvement in crypto centers on determining whether certain digital assets qualify as securities under U.S. law.
To make this determination, the SEC applies the Howey Test, a legal framework established by the Supreme Court in 1946. If an asset involves an investment of money in a common enterprise with an expectation of profits derived from the efforts of others, it may be classified as a security.
This test has been central to high-profile enforcement actions. For example, the SEC sued Ripple Labs in 2020, alleging that its token XRP was an unregistered security. The ongoing litigation has sparked widespread debate about how utility tokens should be regulated and whether older rulings apply fairly to modern blockchain networks.
Similarly, platforms offering lending products or interest-bearing accounts—such as BlockFi—have faced SEC action for offering unregistered securities. These cases emphasize that any crypto product promising returns based on centralized management may fall under SEC oversight.
Crypto exchanges and custodians handling security tokens must also comply with strict rules governing broker-dealers, including capital requirements, custody standards, and disclosure obligations.
Jurisdictional Overlap: Where Commodities Meet Securities
The fundamental tension between the CFTC and SEC stems from differing classifications of digital assets. While BTC and ETH are widely accepted as commodities, many newer tokens—especially those issued through Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) or DeFi protocols—occupy a gray area.
Stablecoins, for instance, have become a flashpoint in this debate. The CFTC argues that stablecoins like Tether (USDT) or USD Coin (USDC) function primarily as digital commodities used for trading and settlement. However, the SEC contends that if a stablecoin is marketed with yield-generating features or profit expectations, it could meet the definition of a security.
In 2024, the SEC concluded an investigation into Paxos and its issuance of Binance USD (BUSD), ultimately determining that BUSD did not qualify as a security. This decision provided temporary relief but also highlighted the inconsistent application of regulatory principles across similar assets.
👉 See how compliance frameworks are evolving in real time.
Such ambiguity forces companies to navigate a patchwork of interpretations, increasing legal risk and compliance costs.
Key Developments (2023–2024)
Recent years have seen significant shifts in how both agencies assert authority:
- House Legislation on Crypto Oversight (2024): In May 2024, the U.S. House passed a bill proposing clearer jurisdictional boundaries—granting the CFTC oversight of spot markets for commodities like Bitcoin and Ethereum, while reserving securities regulation for the SEC. If enacted, this could reduce overlap and provide much-needed clarity.
- CFTC Chair’s Assertion on Asset Classification: CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam stated in 2024 that up to 70% of circulating digital assets are commodities, not securities. This bold claim reinforces the CFTC’s expanding role and sets the stage for future inter-agency disputes.
- CFTC vs. Uniswap Labs Settlement: The enforcement action against Uniswap Labs signaled regulators’ intent to extend oversight into DeFi, despite challenges posed by decentralized governance and non-custodial architecture.
- Increased SEC-CFTC Cooperation: Recognizing the risks of regulatory arbitrage, both agencies signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to enhance coordination, share information, and delineate responsibilities more clearly.
Looking Ahead: Building Compliance in Uncertain Times
As both agencies continue asserting jurisdiction, crypto businesses must adopt proactive compliance strategies. Misclassifying a token can lead to severe consequences—ranging from fines to operational shutdowns.
Projects should conduct thorough legal assessments using tools like the Howey Test while remaining alert to evolving guidance from both regulators. Exchanges must ensure proper licensing, implement robust AML/KYC protocols, and maintain transparent records.
Investors, too, benefit from understanding these distinctions. Assets regulated as securities typically come with greater disclosure and investor protections, whereas commodity-based products may offer more flexibility but less oversight.
👉 Stay ahead of regulatory changes with actionable insights.
Ultimately, legislative clarity remains the best path forward. Until Congress establishes a comprehensive digital asset framework, market participants will continue navigating a complex web of overlapping authorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What determines whether a cryptocurrency is a commodity or a security?
A: The classification hinges on factors like token functionality and investor expectations. The SEC uses the Howey Test—if profits depend on third-party efforts, it’s likely a security. The CFTC generally views Bitcoin and Ethereum as commodities due to their decentralized nature.
Q: Can a single crypto asset be both a commodity and a security?
A: Not simultaneously under current law. However, different tokens from the same project might be classified differently depending on use case and distribution method.
Q: How do CFTC and SEC enforcement actions affect crypto exchanges?
A: Exchanges must comply with both sets of rules depending on what they list. Offering unregistered securities risks SEC penalties; facilitating manipulative trading could trigger CFTC action.
Q: Why does regulatory overlap create problems for innovation?
A: Uncertainty discourages investment and development. Companies may delay launches or avoid U.S. markets altogether due to fear of unintended violations.
Q: Is there bipartisan support for resolving crypto regulation?
A: Yes—there’s growing consensus in Congress that clear rules are needed. Recent legislative efforts reflect attempts to assign clear roles to the CFTC and SEC.
Q: How can DeFi platforms comply with regulations designed for centralized entities?
A: This remains a major challenge. Some propose self-regulatory models or technical solutions like embedded compliance protocols, but no universal standard exists yet.
Core keywords: CFTC vs SEC, cryptocurrency regulation, digital asset compliance, crypto commodities, crypto securities, Howey Test, regulatory overlap, DeFi regulation