Ethereum staking has evolved rapidly over the past few years, and at the heart of this transformation stands Lido Finance—the leading liquid staking protocol with over 25% of all staked ETH flowing through its platform. Now, Lido is taking a bold step toward greater decentralization with Lido Improvement Proposal (LIP) 28, a governance overhaul designed to empower stETH holders and strengthen trust in decentralized decision-making.
This proposal introduces a dual governance model that shifts power dynamics within the protocol, giving users who stake ETH through Lido a meaningful voice in critical decisions—previously reserved only for LDO tokenholders.
A New Era of User-Centric Governance
At its core, LIP-28 aims to align incentives between protocol governance and user security. The current system grants full decision-making authority to LDO holders, who govern the Lido DAO. While effective for rapid development, this centralized control poses risks to stETH holders—especially those with long-term exposure to staked assets.
Ethereum’s staking mechanics involve a complex unbonding process, meaning users can’t instantly withdraw their staked ETH. This illiquidity increases the importance of trust in protocol decisions. If a controversial change were implemented—such as altering fee structures or integrating risky validators—users could be stuck without recourse.
👉 Discover how next-gen staking platforms are redefining user control and security.
LIP-28 addresses this by introducing a dynamic timelock mechanism. Under the new model:
- Any decision approved by the Lido DAO enters a timelocked execution phase.
- stETH holders can signal disagreement by depositing their tokens into a designated protest contract.
- If 1% of total staked ETH is deposited into the contract ("first seal"), the execution delay is extended.
- If deposits reach 10% of total staked ETH ("second seal"), a “rage quit” is triggered.
The “rage quit” acts as an emergency brake: it halts execution entirely and allows dissenting stakers to exit the protocol safely before any change takes effect. This ensures that no major decision can proceed without considering the will of the broader user base.
Why Dual Governance Matters for DeFi
Decentralized finance thrives on the principle of user sovereignty—the idea that participants should have control over their assets and influence over the protocols they use. Yet many DeFi projects still concentrate power in the hands of tokenholder elites.
Lido’s dual governance model sets a precedent by recognizing two key stakeholder groups:
- LDO holders: Responsible for strategic direction, funding, and protocol upgrades.
- stETH holders: Representing economic stakeholders whose assets are directly impacted by governance decisions.
By balancing these interests, Lido moves closer to true decentralization. This model could inspire similar reforms across DeFi, particularly in protocols where user deposits significantly outweigh governance token supply.
Moreover, with Ethereum’s Pectra upgrade recently enhancing network efficiency and scalability, interest in staking platforms has surged. As more users enter the ecosystem, demand for transparent and inclusive governance will only grow.
Market Reaction and Competitive Landscape
The announcement of LIP-28 was met with strong positive sentiment. LDO token prices rose 6.5%, outpacing the broader market’s 2.5% gain reflected in the CoinDesk 20 Index. This surge indicates investor confidence in Lido’s commitment to decentralization and long-term sustainability.
However, Lido doesn’t operate in a vacuum. Competitors like Rocket Pool and Frax Ether are also innovating in the liquid staking space, each offering unique approaches to decentralization and node operator diversity.
Still, Lido’s scale gives it outsized influence. With more than one-quarter of all staked ETH under its management, any governance shift reverberates across DeFi. If LIP-28 passes, it may pressure rivals to adopt similar safeguards—or risk appearing less user-aligned.
👉 See how leading staking protocols are adapting to evolving user demands in 2025.
Core Keywords Driving the Narrative
To ensure alignment with search intent and SEO best practices, the following core keywords have been naturally integrated throughout this article:
- Lido Finance
- stETH holders
- Ethereum staking
- dual governance
- LIP-28
- liquid staking
- DeFi governance
- LDO token
These terms reflect what users are actively searching for: insights into governance models, security features, and the future of staking on Ethereum.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What is LIP-28?
A: LIP-28 is a proposed governance upgrade for Lido Finance that introduces dual governance, allowing stETH holders to veto high-impact decisions through a protest mechanism and potential “rage quit.”
Q: How does the dual governance model work?
A: After a DAO vote, a timelock is triggered. stETH holders can deposit tokens to protest. At 1% deposit threshold, delays increase; at 10%, execution halts and users can exit safely.
Q: Why do stETH holders need veto power?
A: Because staked ETH has withdrawal limitations due to Ethereum’s unbonding process, users need protection from sudden, risky changes they can’t immediately opt out of.
Q: Has LIP-28 been approved yet?
A: Not yet. The proposal is under community discussion, with an on-chain vote expected soon. Final implementation depends on voter approval.
Q: Could this model be adopted by other DeFi protocols?
A: Yes. If successful, Lido’s dual governance could become a blueprint for balancing DAO control with user sovereignty across decentralized applications.
Q: What impact does this have on LDO token value?
A: Short-term price increased 6.5% post-announcement, reflecting market approval. Long-term value may benefit from enhanced trust and reduced protocol risk.
👉 Learn how decentralized governance models are shaping the future of crypto investments.
The Road Ahead for Lido and Ethereum Staking
As Ethereum continues to mature as a platform for decentralized applications, so too must its supporting infrastructure evolve. Lido’s proposal represents more than a technical upgrade—it’s a philosophical shift toward inclusive, resilient governance.
If implemented, LIP-28 could become a landmark moment in DeFi history: the point at which a dominant protocol formally acknowledged that real decentralization requires more than just distributed tokens—it requires distributed power.
For users, developers, and investors alike, the message is clear: the future of staking isn’t just about yield or efficiency. It’s about trust, transparency, and shared control.
With community feedback shaping the final version of LIP-28, all eyes are on the upcoming on-chain vote. One thing is certain—whatever the outcome, it will influence how we think about governance in decentralized systems for years to come.