The evolution of money has always been intertwined with technological progress, economic shifts, and institutional trust. As the global economy undergoes rapid digital transformation, central banks and financial experts are re-examining the foundations of monetary systems. A 2019 discussion hosted by the China Finance 40 Forum (CF40) titled "From Currency's Evolution and Theory to Digital Currency" brought together leading experts to explore these critical questions. The debate centered on the nature of money, the necessity of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), and the regulatory challenges posed by private digital tokens.
This article synthesizes key insights from that dialogue, offering a structured analysis grounded in economic theory, historical patterns, and forward-looking policy considerations.
The Essence of Money: An Incentive System with Ultimate Purpose
To understand digital currency, we must first revisit what money fundamentally is.
Traditional monetary theories—classical, neoclassical, and even Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)—tend to treat money as a given, focusing instead on how it should be used rather than questioning its core essence. However, the CF40 discussion reframed money not merely as a medium of exchange, but as an incentive mechanism with three defining characteristics:
- Ultimate Purpose: Individuals engage in labor, trade, investment, and production primarily to acquire money—it is the final goal.
- Incentive Nature: The desire to obtain money drives competition and economic activity.
- Implicit Rules: While unwritten, these rules govern how people earn or spend money, shaping behavior across markets.
👉 Discover how digital innovation is reshaping global finance today.
In this view, the evolution of monetary systems is essentially about increasing the credibility of these underlying rules. Every shift—from commodity money to fiat currency—has aimed to reduce social friction costs arising from distrust. Digital currencies represent the latest attempt to solve this age-old problem: how to ensure that everyone accepts and trusts the same set of monetary rules.
Bitcoin, for instance, sought to address concerns over inflationary monetary policies by enforcing a hard cap on supply. Yet this very feature created what experts call the "Bitcoin Paradox": its scarcity makes it a "good money" ideal for storing value, but less suitable for daily transactions. As a result, it behaves more like an asset priced in traditional currencies ("bad money") than a functional currency itself.
Moreover, while limited supply might seem reassuring, an unlimited number of entities issuing similar tokens could collectively produce infinite supply—potentially creating new forms of credit expansion akin to M2 growth. This underscores a crucial insight: security is not the primary concern with digital currencies; the real risk lies in uncontrolled credit creation.
Is a Central Bank Digital Currency Necessary?
The debate over CBDCs hinges on two opposing perspectives.
Skeptical View: Private Demand Is for Super-Accounts, Not Just Digital Cash
One school of thought argues that there’s little need for central banks to issue digital currency because private sectors don’t want simple digital accounts—they want sophisticated “super-accounts” capable of managing complex financial assets across borders and platforms.
Private firms are already building ecosystems where users can store value, make payments, invest, and access credit—all within integrated digital environments. In such a world, government-issued digital cash may seem redundant. More concerning is the possibility that private actors could bypass traditional financial rails entirely, using decentralized tokens on blockchain networks to conduct peer-to-peer exchanges without intermediaries.
If this happens, monetary sovereignty and regulatory oversight could be fundamentally undermined.
Pro-CBDC View: Digital Transformation Makes It Inevitable
On the other side, many argue that launching a central bank digital currency is not just beneficial—it’s essential in a digitally transforming world.
First, tech giants like Meta (formerly Facebook) possess vast user bases, data resources, and technical capabilities. Projects like Libra (now Diem) demonstrated that such companies could potentially issue global digital tokens with widespread adoption—posing systemic risks to national financial stability.
Second, as economies digitize, existing monetary frameworks must evolve to remain relevant. A well-designed CBDC allows policymakers to experiment with new tools for monetary transmission, financial inclusion, and cross-border payments.
Finally, money is inherently a public good, tied to state sovereignty and macroeconomic management. While private innovation brings efficiency, it cannot replace the role of central banks in ensuring price stability, managing inflation, and conducting countercyclical policy.
Monetary Policy and the Limits of Central Bank Power
Under fiat systems, central banks hold monopoly over currency issuance—but their power to create credit is limited. Money represents national credit, not private credit. Only when central banks or treasuries purchase private-sector assets do they influence private credit conditions.
A key implication: central banks can affect risk-free interest rates but not risk premiums, which are determined by market perceptions of private creditworthiness.
This distinction becomes critical when assessing private digital currencies. If private tokens begin functioning as de facto money—especially across borders—they could erode the effectiveness of domestic monetary policy.
Regulatory Challenges of Digital Currencies
The rise of digital tokens introduces several systemic risks:
1. Weakened Monetary Policy Transmission
Global stablecoins like Libra could reach billions of users rapidly. If widely adopted for domestic transactions, households and businesses might denominate assets and liabilities in these foreign-backed digital units. Since central banks have no control over their issuance or interest rates, monetary policy would lose its leverage.
In extreme cases, widespread use of stablecoins could trigger a “bad money drives out good” dynamic—where national currencies are displaced or forced into dollarization-like regimes.
2. Threats to Financial Stability
Stablecoins create vulnerabilities due to potential capital flight and runs:
- In emerging economies with weaker currencies, funds may rapidly shift into global stablecoins during times of stress.
- Conversely, if confidence in a stablecoin wanes—even temporarily—it could face massive redemption demands akin to a bank run.
Without public oversight or lender-of-last-resort support, such systems pose systemic risks with international spillover effects—effectively "free-riding" on global financial stability.
👉 See how next-generation financial infrastructure is being built.
3. Risks in Compliance and Market Power
Digital currencies also raise serious concerns regarding:
- Anti-money laundering (AML)
- Countering terrorist financing (CTF)
- Data privacy
- Market concentration and monopolistic behavior
Decentralized networks may offer technical anonymity, but they also enable illicit flows and evade regulatory accountability.
Can Technology Resolve the Dilemma Between Constrained and Elastic Money?
Historically, money has oscillated between two models:
| Type | Characteristics | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constrained (e.g., gold, Bitcoin) | Supply capped by physical scarcity or algorithmic rules | Prevents inflation | Prone to deflation; limits economic flexibility |
| Elastic (e.g., fiat) | Supply adjustable by central authority | Supports growth during downturns | Risk of overissuance and moral hazard |
Fiat money has dominated for decades precisely because it offers flexibility—but at a cost. Interest rates have fallen to zero or below in many economies, exhausting conventional policy tools. This reflects a deeper issue: when issuance power is unchecked, institutions face moral hazard.
Even projects like Libra—marketed as stable—would inevitably expand credit once operational. Any entity issuing widely used digital money will face incentives to grow its balance sheet, risking instability over time.
Thus, while cryptography and distributed ledger technology offer new tools for transparency and automation, they do not eliminate the fundamental tension between scarcity and elasticity. Whether future systems can better balance these forces remains an open question.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: What is the main purpose of a central bank digital currency (CBDC)?
A: A CBDC aims to provide a safe, sovereign-backed digital form of money that supports efficient payments, enhances financial inclusion, and preserves monetary sovereignty amid rising private digital currencies.
Q: Can private companies legally issue their own digital currencies?
A: Technically yes—but widespread adoption poses regulatory risks. Most jurisdictions require compliance with AML/KYC laws. If a private token functions as money at scale, it may face strict oversight or prohibition.
Q: Does Bitcoin solve the problem of inflationary monetary policy?
A: Partially. Its fixed supply prevents central bank manipulation, but it doesn't function well as everyday money due to volatility and low transaction throughput. It acts more like digital gold than currency.
Q: How could stablecoins threaten national economies?
A: By replacing local currencies in payments and savings, especially in high-inflation countries. This weakens domestic monetary policy and exposes economies to external shocks tied to stablecoin reserves.
Q: Will CBDCs replace cash?
A: Not necessarily. Many central banks plan to maintain physical cash alongside digital versions. CBDCs are meant to complement—not eliminate—existing forms of money.
Q: Are cryptocurrencies secure?
A: Cryptographic protocols are generally robust, but security risks exist at application layers—such as exchanges and wallets. The bigger concern is systemic risk from unregulated credit creation.
Conclusion: The Future of Money Is Still Being Written
Money evolves alongside society’s trust mechanisms and technological capabilities. While digital innovation opens exciting possibilities, it also reintroduces old dilemmas in new forms.
Central banks must act decisively—not out of fear of disruption, but to ensure that the core functions of money—stability, inclusivity, and controllability—remain intact in the digital age.
👉 Stay ahead in the future of finance with cutting-edge insights.
The journey from barter to blockchain shows one enduring truth: money is not just technology—it’s trust encoded in rules. How we design those rules will shape the economy of tomorrow.